Gary Marcus

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -20
8/3/2024, 12:33:50 AM
X
In reply to:
Bojan Tunguz
@tunguz
·
94d
@GaryMarcus Prediction: you’ll never say you were wrong, just you never did before.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
94d
@tunguz Prediction this tweet will not age well, just like Yann LeCun’s critiques of my critiques of LLMs :)
Bojan Tunguz
@tunguz
·
94d
Prediction: this tweet will not age well. Screenshotting it just in case. For the record.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
94d
I just wrote a great piece for WIRED predicting that the AI bubble will in collapse in 2025, and now I wish I hadn’t.

Clearly, I got the year wrong. It’s going to be days or weeks from now, not months.

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about AI predictions, a topic of public interest and debate. The tone is defensive and somewhat confrontational, aiming to address a critique by @tunguz. The content focuses on the accuracy of past predictions and the willingness to correct errors.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions, maintaining a focus on factual accuracy rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive dialogue by addressing a critique, though it carries a defensive tone. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges a past error regarding the ease of Winograd Schemas, showing a willingness to correct mistakes. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, focusing on factual accuracy and public discourse. [+1]