Gary Marcus

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -16
8/3/2024, 5:01:52 AM
X
In reply to:
Bojan Tunguz
@tunguz
·
95d
@GaryMarcus @xtbot As a matter of principle I don’t bet. Never have, never will. Especially about matters where I have reliable inside knowledge that I am not at liberty to divulge.

I’ve spent the last few months in Palo Alto. Talking to many leaders in tech and AI. There is absolutely *no one*…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
96d
@xtbot @tunguz What odds will you give me @tunguz that 90 days from now VC will by most accounts be putting much less money in AI startups? That both MSFT and NVidia will be down from where there are today? That more than one major media source will have written pieces about the collapse of the…
tian/天
@xtbot
·
96d
@tunguz @GaryMarcus shots fired 😄 https://twitter.com/xtbot/status…
Bojan Tunguz
@tunguz
·
96d
@GaryMarcus Prediction: you’ll never say you were wrong, just you never did before.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
96d
@tunguz Prediction this tweet will not age well, just like Yann LeCun’s critiques of my critiques of LLMs :)
Bojan Tunguz
@tunguz
·
96d
Prediction: this tweet will not age well. Screenshotting it just in case. For the record.

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the future of AI investments and the performance of AI models, which are significant public issues. The tone is defensive and somewhat confrontational, aiming to clarify his position and critique the understanding of his views by others.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the confrontational tone could escalate tensions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on defending the author's position. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism but also includes a personal attack by implying the other party has a cursory understanding of his views. [-2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a public debate responsibly. [+1]