In reply to:
Tony Robinson
@DrTonyRobinson
·
409d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the development and valuation of AI technologies, specifically focusing on the limitations of current large language models (LLMs) and the potential impact of recursive reasoning systems. The tone is critical but not hostile, aiming to contribute to the ongoing debate about the future of AI and its market valuation.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a critical analysis of a technological issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by discussing the limitations of current AI technologies and the need for recursive reasoning systems. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the current state of AI technology and market valuations without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.