Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47

Score 36

@Kayodeodeleye There’s something to what you say, but also many people are frustrated, in a way you don’t acknowledge, e.g., this Upwork survey. So yes, the tech will get cheaper, but if the hallucinations and boneheaded errors aren’t fixed, most people and many companies will give up on the…

8/3/2024, 6:26:09 AM

In reply to:

Kayode

@Kayodeodeleye

409d

@GaryMarcus There’s an investor bubble NOT a utility bubble

All that cash chasing monster returns will probably be wiped out

Consumers win though, Gen AI is a real, useful productivity tool

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

409d

I just wrote a great piece for WIRED predicting that the AI bubble will in collapse in 2025, and now I wish I hadn’t.

Clearly, I got the year wrong. It’s going to be days or weeks from now, not months.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the utility and challenges of AI technology in the workplace, referencing a survey to support the argument. The tone is constructive, aiming to provide a balanced view by acknowledging the potential benefits of AI while highlighting significant concerns.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by presenting a balanced view, acknowledging both the potential benefits and the frustrations associated with AI technology. This approach helps to foster a more nuanced discussion. [+2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the technology and its impact rather than attacking individuals. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the frustrations of many people who are struggling with AI technology. It uses data from a survey to substantiate these concerns, which can help others understand the issue more deeply. [+2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out specific issues (hallucinations and errors) that need to be addressed for AI technology to be more effective. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]