In reply to:
Gooey Vuitton
@HooliganGrundy
·
87d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
87d
The statement engages in a discussion about political responsibility and the impact of political actions over the last few decades, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is conversational but critical, aiming to highlight a perceived bipartisan failure in addressing destabilizing factors in American society.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does place blame on both political parties, which could be seen as divisive. However, it does not use harmful language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on assigning blame.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived failure of both political parties. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to contribute to a political discussion, albeit in a critical manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.