The statement by Gary Marcus addresses a public issue related to the development and control of artificial intelligence (AI). It suggests that relying solely on Silicon Valley for AI advancements may not be the best approach, implying a need for broader involvement or oversight. The tone is cautionary and aims to provoke thought about the governance and ethical considerations of AI development.
- The statement does not cause harm and instead aims to prevent potential harm by advocating for a more inclusive approach to AI development. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the potential risks of a narrow control over AI development, encouraging a broader perspective. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Silicon Valley without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for a more responsible and inclusive approach to AI development, which can be seen as beneficial for society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a significant public concern. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.