Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 46
8/3/2024, 3:07:47 PM
X
In reply to:
Alexandra
@AI__Alexandra
·
410d
@GaryMarcus @tunguz Successful AI is shipped in iterations, it took nearly a decade for GenAI to get to where it is today. I know, I worked on it in 2017.

Companies aren’t bearish bc incremental progress is still a win. Every win creates a new roadmap.

This is the nature of research, and research…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
410d
If everyone in Silicon Valley is so bullish, as @tunguz claims, why have the CEOs of three of the highest-profile startups (Adept, Inflection, Character) ditched their companies in the last six months?

Something ain’t right. https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/s…

The statement 'not a huge win when the founders ditch their employees' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to the behavior of startup founders and its implications for employees and the broader tech industry. The tone is critical and the intent is to challenge the notion of success in the context of leadership stability in startups.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but could be seen as critical of the founders' actions. It does not use harmful language.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the actions of the founders rather than attacking them personally. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it could be more constructive. [-1]