Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47

Score 52

-4

THIS. There is definitely a Dunning-Kruger thing going on; the more sophisticated you are, the more you notice the errors. The less sophisticated you are, the more impressed you are by the fluent but often flawed text.

Dr. Sarah Etlinger

@drsaephd

410d

@GaryMarcus My students think it helps them but it actually doesn't.

8/3/2024, 3:27:05 PM

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the perceived limitations and public understanding of generative AI, a significant societal issue.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply a lack of sophistication in some individuals, which could be seen as dismissive.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does indirectly question the intelligence of others, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and dismissive. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It implies a personal attack on those who are less sophisticated, which can be seen as an ad hominem argument. [-2]