The statement critiques the media's handling of the Hamilton 68 dashboard, alleging that many news stories were based on false information and that only one outlet issued corrections. It accuses major news organizations of failing to address their errors and provides a link to a video for further context.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to expose misinformation, which can be seen as an effort to do no harm by correcting false narratives. However, the accusatory tone could potentially harm the reputations of the media outlets involved.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy of individuals but criticizes organizations, which is generally acceptable in public discourse. However, the use of strong language like 'lies' and 'hoax' could be seen as disrespectful.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.By highlighting the issue of misinformation, the statement promotes understanding and transparency. However, the confrontational tone may undermine empathy and compassion.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism of media outlets but does not engage in personal attacks. It focuses on the actions of organizations rather than individuals.
[+1]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement calls out media outlets for not correcting their mistakes, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting errors. However, it does not acknowledge any potential mistakes in its own claims.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to address a significant issue in media integrity, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. However, the tone could be more constructive.
[+1]