Matt Taibbi

Rank 30 of 47

Score -14

Hamilton 68 was just one example where we got lucky and they were caught. The mechanism of creating a bogus “research” tool and using it as a way to indicate foreign links or argue for accounts to be censored is very easily done — there’s probably a lot more of this.

@wildurthhealing

@SKLeonardAZ

469d

And the lefties have no idea.

8/3/2024, 4:21:43 PM

The statement and the associated conversation address the issue of misinformation and the use of potentially misleading research tools to influence public opinion and media narratives. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that there are systemic issues with how information is presented and used to justify censorship or other actions. The statement implies a lack of transparency and accountability in the media and research communities.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to expose what the author perceives as harmful practices in media and research, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by calling out misinformation.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the actions of organizations rather than individuals, thus not engaging in cyberbullying or harassment.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By highlighting issues of misinformation, the statement promotes understanding and encourages critical thinking, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices, though it could be seen as somewhat harsh in its tone. It does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on systemic issues.
Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
The statement acknowledges mistakes made by media outlets, such as the Washington Post issuing corrections, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its platform to call for greater transparency and accountability in media and research, aiming for the betterment of society.