Matt Taibbi

The statement by @NTKriss, 'On the contrary, I’m trying all the time to keep them in the public eye, what are you talking about?' is part of a broader conversation that involves public figures and issues related to journalism, public accountability, and the dissemination of information. This qualifies as public discourse as it engages with public concerns about transparency and the role of media in society.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the broader conversation includes inflammatory language and personal attacks, which could be harmful.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement itself does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the broader conversation includes such elements.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is defensive and does not contribute to a constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement is a defensive response and does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. The broader conversation includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform to promote responsible or constructive dialogue.