-10
Future of Life Institute
@FLI_org
·
411d
The statement is a reaction to a tweet about California's SB 1047 legislation and its potential impact on regulating advanced AI, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning technology regulation and corporate responsibility.
- The statement uses aggressive and inflammatory language ('fuck up the world'), which can be seen as harmful and does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and could be interpreted as cyberbullying or harassment towards the entities involved. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it uses a confrontational tone. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack on the entities involved without providing a reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so irresponsibly and without integrity, given its aggressive and inflammatory nature. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.