In reply to:
Crazy Compassion
@compassionsays
·
87d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
88d
The statement and the image constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about political ideologies and their impact on society. The tone of the statement is defensive and dismissive, while the image and the initial conversation express a strong critique of both major political parties in the United States, labeling them as forms of fascism. The conversation touches on the principles of promoting understanding, engaging in constructive criticism, and using influence responsibly.
- The statement and image do not strive to do no harm, as they use inflammatory language and imagery that could be seen as provocative and divisive. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and image do not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as they broadly label political parties and their supporters in a derogatory manner. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and image do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as they use harsh language and imagery to criticize political ideologies. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement and image do not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as they use ad hominem attacks and do not offer a constructive path forward. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement and image do not use influence for the betterment of society, as they contribute to polarization and do not foster a productive discussion. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.