In reply to:
Tony Yates
@t0nyyates
·
411d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the valuation of AI companies, investor sentiment, and market dynamics, which are relevant public issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a reasoned argument about market valuations and investor sentiment. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the rationality of pessimism about high price-earnings ratios in the context of recent developments in AI. It encourages a deeper look at market dynamics. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning an argument without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the substance of the issue rather than the individuals involved. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful discussion about market valuations and investor sentiment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.