In reply to:
Anthony Rawlings
@arketex
·
88d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
88d
The statement '@arketex Oh my Lord. Maybe read Lincoln‘s Second Inaugural sometime.' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about public issues, specifically the role of morality and government. The tone is somewhat dismissive and sarcastic, suggesting that @arketex's understanding of morality and government might benefit from historical context.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone could be seen as unconstructive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the dismissive tone could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more sarcastic and dismissive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a personal attack or ad hominem argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its dismissive tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.