Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement by @hillharper appears to engage in public discourse as it discusses political maneuvers and implications involving public figures and elections, which are substantive public issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies unethical behavior, which could be seen as harmful to reputations. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make serious allegations that could affect the dignity of the individuals involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and suggests corruption. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes personal attacks and implies unethical behavior without evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible, given the serious nature of the allegations without substantiation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.