Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically a political campaign and the values associated with the candidates.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('ugly' and 'wrong') to describe the opponent's campaign strategy. This could be seen as a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use divisive language ('I don't know what your values are'). This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards Ilhan's campaign but does so at the expense of the opponent's dignity. This is a mixed adherence.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses a dismissive tone towards those who might support the opponent. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to support a candidate, but it could be more responsible and less divisive. This is a minor adherence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.