In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
Β·
413d
Pierrick Chevallier | IA
@CharaspowerAI
Β·
415d
The statement and replies engage in a discussion about the capabilities and limitations of AI, specifically in the context of learning sequences of pixels versus understanding the world. The tone is critical and somewhat informal, with a touch of humor. The use of the term 'batshit' could be seen as unprofessional or disrespectful, which may detract from the constructive nature of the discourse.
- The statement aims to critique AI technology, which is a valid subject of public discourse. However, the use of the term 'batshit' could be seen as disrespectful and potentially harmful.Β [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of informal and potentially offensive language ('batshit') does not respect the dignity of others, even if it is directed at a non-human subject (AI).Β [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion due to its informal and potentially offensive language.Β [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While the statement engages in criticism, it does so in a manner that could be perceived as a personal attack on the creators or proponents of the AI technology, rather than focusing solely on the technology itself.Β [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.