In reply to:
Sara Nelson
@FlyingWithSara
·
89d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a historical labor dispute involving air traffic controllers, which is a public issue. The tone is reflective and supportive, agreeing with the sentiment expressed by @FlyingWithSara about the significance of the PATCO strike and the naming of National Airport.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions, as it is reflective and supportive. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the historical significance of the PATCO strike and agreeing with the sentiment expressed by @FlyingWithSara. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by agreeing with @FlyingWithSara and adding a personal reflection, without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a historical perspective and solidarity among workers, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.