In reply to:
C B Miller
@sisboombahbah
·
414d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the ethics and behavior of a public figure (Trump) and his relationship with Elon Musk. The tone is critical and accusatory, and the intent appears to be to highlight perceived corruption and ethical lapses.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it includes derogatory language and accusations of corruption without substantial evidence, which can be harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in cyberbullying and potentially hate speech by calling someone 'fucking retarded' and accusing them of having no ethics. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and derogatory. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; it uses the platform to spread potentially harmful and unsubstantiated accusations. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.