In reply to:
Mustafa
@Mustafx24
ยท
414d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
ยท
414d
Mustafa
@Mustafx24
ยท
414d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
ยท
414d
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the future of AI technology and its impact on society. The reply by @Mustafx24 and subsequent responses also contribute to this public discourse. The specific statement in question, however, is a reply that addresses the behavior of another participant in the conversation rather than the substantive issue itself.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is dismissive and condescending, which can be harmful.ย [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in a form of public shaming and could be seen as cyberbullying.ย [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack by accusing the other party of not doing their homework.ย [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.