In reply to:
Zeyuan Allen-Zhu
@ZeyuanAllenZhu
·
419d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about a research paper on language models, referencing a critique by Ernest Davis, and linking to a detailed discussion. The tone is professional and aims to inform and engage others in a scholarly debate.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the content of the research and the critique rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging others to consider the critique and engage in the discussion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by referencing a detailed critique and inviting further dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges the possibility of mistakes by highlighting concerns raised by another scholar. [+2]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its platform to contribute to the betterment of society by fostering a scholarly discussion on the capabilities and limitations of language models. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.