In reply to:
NLeseul
@NLeseul
·
415d
The statement 'I don’t see any *evidence* that he is trying.' is part of a larger conversation that critiques public figures and their actions, specifically focusing on Donald Trump and his statements. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is part of a critical conversation that could be seen as harsh.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is part of a thread that includes personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is a form of criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments directly. However, the broader conversation includes such elements.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in public discourse, though the tone is critical. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.