Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 97
8/4/2024, 9:47:26 PM
X
In reply to:
Serafim Batzoglou
@s_batzoglou
·
416d
@GaryMarcus I can’t imagine JD wanting the U.S. to be a monarchy. That is the least of my concerns in this election.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
416d
@s_batzoglou he is talking to a dude (yarvin) who wants the US to be a monarchy, is violently and unrepentantly offensive towards childless women, etc. what more do you want?

he probably is smart but he’s definitely dangerous. the issue his ethics, not his IQ.
Serafim Batzoglou
@s_batzoglou
·
416d
@GaryMarcus Most political spin is without context, especially this season. To me JD Vance sounds very intelligent, pro tech, and overall a great guy despite the BS political spin, “weird” and other baseless things. And nobody is perfect.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
416d
@s_batzoglou i watched your clip, my mistake, and without context (which of course has been omitted) it tells us essentially nothing.
Serafim Batzoglou
@s_batzoglou
·
416d
@GaryMarcus That’s why it’s important to go for candidates who only say very intelligent things:
End Wokeness
@EndWokeness
·
416d
WARNING: This clip of Kamala Harris will make you want to claw your ears off
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
416d
Ouch.

The statement and the preceding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive debate about political figures, their associations, and their ideologies. The tone of the conversation is critical and somewhat confrontational, focusing on the perceived dangers and ethical concerns related to a political candidate and his associations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the preceding conversation do not directly cause harm but are critical of public figures and their associations. The tone is confrontational, which could be seen as harmful to the individuals being discussed. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects the privacy of individuals to some extent but engages in a public critique of their associations and ideologies. The mention of 'violently and unrepentantly offensive towards childless women' could be seen as a form of harassment or hate speech. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on criticism and highlighting negative aspects of the individuals involved. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly in the mention of 'dumbest things imaginable' and 'violently and unrepentantly offensive.' [-2]