Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 110
8/5/2024, 2:22:40 AM
X
In reply to:
Alexandra
@AI__Alexandra
·
417d
@GaryMarcus @kriscrno @Shoestring_Lab Why isn’t CNN reporting on this? If it were Trump we wouldn’t hear the end of it
Steve McLaughlin
@SteveMcNY
·
420d
“With Kamala you have to put up with a constant amount of soul-destroying criticism and also her own lack of confidence. So you’re constantly sort of propping up a bully and it’s not really clear why.” https://nypost.com/2024/08/02/us…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
417d
@AI__Alexandra @kriscrno @Shoestring_Lab sadistic, maybe not? vindictive and without empathy, definitely.

there are a LOT of articles like this one btw
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/…
Alexandra
@AI__Alexandra
·
417d
@kriscrno @Shoestring_Lab @GaryMarcus Yeah, I don’t see anything about him which shows he’s pathologically sadistic.
Not a zombie
@kriscrno
·
417d
@AI__Alexandra @Shoestring_Lab @GaryMarcus That definition appears to fit Donald quite well, actually.
As I said, Trump is complicated. He is more than just grandiose.
Alexandra
@AI__Alexandra
·
417d
@kriscrno @Shoestring_Lab @GaryMarcus A malignant narcissist is the kind of person who befriends others while stabbing them in the back. Many of them have great reputations.

They have no loyalty to anyone but themselves and they are the hardest to spot.

Trump is a grandiose narcissist.
Alexandra
@AI__Alexandra
·
417d
@kriscrno @Shoestring_Lab @GaryMarcus There isn’t enough public info to classify Trump as a malignant narcissist.

I’ve known 2 malignant narcissists, and from learning about others, they all have secret hedonistic and depraved lives which extends far beyond sleeping with prostitutes.

They are also highly sadistic,…

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a discussion about public figures, specifically Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, and their actions and behaviors. The tone is critical and comparative, aiming to highlight perceived discrepancies in media coverage and public interest.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly aim to do harm, but its critical tone and comparison could be seen as contributing to a negative discourse. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does touch on personal aspects of public figures, which could be seen as disrespectful. Minor violation. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism and comparison. Violation. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly towards Trump and his followers. Significant violation. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible and lacking integrity due to its critical and comparative nature. Minor violation. [-1]