Gary Marcus

The statement and the preceding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the current state and future of AI technology, its implications, and market perceptions. The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to provide insights and provoke thought on the topic.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement and the conversation strive to do no harm by focusing on a critical analysis of AI technology rather than attacking individuals or groups. [+2]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The discussion promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging a deeper look into the realities of AI technology, moving beyond the hype to consider its actual capabilities and limitations. [+2]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The conversation engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, with participants building on each other's points and referencing external sources to support their arguments. [+2]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The participants use their influence to contribute to the betterment of society by fostering a more informed and realistic view of AI technology, which can help guide public opinion and policy. [+2]