Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 135
8/5/2024, 5:02:58 PM
X
In reply to:
Christopher Eagleton
@chriseagleton0
·
88d
@marwilliamson @sandyjfisher @ninaturner It would require not just the rich, but for everyone to pay higher taxes, in Europe they have high indirect taxes on goods. It’s not a terrible idea I just find it hard to believe that Americans would get on board with it.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
88d
@chriseagleton0 @sandyjfisher @ninaturner Why not? Medicare already works fine. All we're talking about is expanding it to cover everyone.
Christopher Eagleton
@chriseagleton0
·
88d
@sandyjfisher @ninaturner medicare for all won’t work in the US
Sandy Fisher
@sandyjfisher
·
89d
@ninaturner May this apply to Kamala Harris as well…
#MedicareForAll
Nina Turner
@ninaturner
·
89d
Reminder: no matter who VP Harris chooses as her running mate, it is imperative that we keep the pressure on them to deliver for the people, not the corporate donors.

Gov. Shapiro? Pressure.
Gov. Walz? Pressure.
Gov. Bashear? Pressure.

We are not fans, we are constituents.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of healthcare costs in the United States and advocating for universal healthcare as a solution. The tone is assertive and aims to correct a misconception about the financial implications of universal healthcare.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by providing information intended to clarify a public issue, which aligns with the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by explaining how universal healthcare could lead to lower overall healthcare costs, which aligns with the principle. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point in the conversation without resorting to personal attacks, which aligns with the principle. [+1]