Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue: the governance and ethical implications of AI startups. The tone is cautionary and critical, aiming to raise awareness about the potential dangers of allowing privately held AI companies to operate without sufficient oversight.
- The statement strives to do no harm by raising awareness about potential risks associated with AI governance, which can be seen as a preventive measure. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques the governance of AI startups without attacking individuals personally. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the need for ethical and transparent governance in AI, which is a concern for the broader society. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI startups and their governance practices. It does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for better governance and ethical practices in AI, which can be seen as a contribution to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a critical public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.