Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 104

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the ethical and legal implications of Nvidia's practices in using copyrighted content for AI training. It raises concerns about potential copyright infringement and the broader issue of fair use, which are significant public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on Nvidia's actions rather than attacking individuals. It raises a legitimate concern about copyright practices, which is a public interest issue. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. It focuses on the actions of a corporation. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the potential harm to creators who may not be compensated for their work. It encourages a discussion on fair use and copyright law. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning Nvidia's practices and the potential legal ramifications. It does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a significant issue, potentially contributing to the betterment of society by advocating for fair compensation for creators. [+1]