Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 96
8/5/2024, 6:56:25 PM
X
In reply to:
Mirad
@mirad_ai
·
419d
@GaryMarcus Now you have your answer to why Elon Musk and others (me included) support Trump.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
419d
@mirad_ai I can assure you that I would not respect myself in the morning if I supported an aging, narcissistic felon with zero respect for democracy.

and why you people insist on calling Ms. Harris by her first name but Trump, I don’t know. (Actually, I do. It’s cheap disrespect.)
Mirad
@mirad_ai
·
419d
@GaryMarcus You are kind of risking your reputation too to back Kamala. It's not the same level, but anyhow.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
419d
Why is Musk risking his reputation—and perhaps his businesses—over Trump? I don’t get it.

If he were ever convicted in this sort of thing, boards would have to fire him etc.
Popular Liberal 🇺🇸
@PopularLiberal
·
420d
NEW JUST IN: The Michigan Attorney General has launched a criminal investigation into Elon Musk's America PAC for Trump on suspicion of swindling voters.

They wasted no time.

The statement 'because you want to vote against *my* preferences? seriously? i don’t think i follow.' is part of a broader conversation about political preferences and support for public figures. The tone is questioning and somewhat defensive, indicating a personal disagreement over political choices. The conversation as a whole engages in public discourse as it discusses political figures, their actions, and the implications of supporting them.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but reflects a personal disagreement over political preferences. It does not escalate the conversation into harmful territory.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on expressing personal confusion and disagreement.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a level of constructive criticism. [+1]