In reply to:
SaliferousStudios 🥥🌴🥥Making animated stories
@SaliferousGames
·
419d
The statement 'Strictly hypothetical' by @SaliferousGames is a reply in a conversation that involves a public figure and a discussion about potential election tampering. This conversation touches on public issues and concerns, making it part of public discourse.
- The statement 'Strictly hypothetical' does not cause harm with words or actions. It is neutral and does not escalate the conversation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It remains neutral.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. It does not misuse the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.