The statement 'Now, eliminate the entire agency' is a strong and sweeping call to action in response to the news article about the UN firing nine staffers from its agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) after an investigation found they may have been involved in an attack on Israel. The tone is assertive and suggests a drastic measure without providing a nuanced discussion or consideration of the broader implications.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it calls for the elimination of an entire agency based on the actions of a few individuals, which could have significant negative consequences for the people the agency serves. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it generalizes the actions of a few to the entire agency, potentially harming innocent staff members and the beneficiaries of the agency's services. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it calls for a drastic action without considering the broader context or the potential harm to vulnerable populations. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a sweeping and extreme suggestion without offering a reasoned argument or considering alternative solutions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, as it advocates for a measure that could have harmful consequences for many people. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.