In reply to:
Revolutionary Blackout Network🥋
@SocialistMMA
·
88d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
88d
The statement by @SocialistMMA and the reply by the user both engage in a discussion about political endorsements and the authenticity of political figures, which are public issues. Therefore, this constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it accuses @SocialistMMA of making up excuses to call the user a fraud, which can be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in a form of personal attack by calling out @SocialistMMA for allegedly making false accusations. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the substance of the disagreement. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.