In reply to:
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the expectations and realities surrounding AI development, specifically the limitations of large language models (LLMs) and the notion of artificial general intelligence (AGI). The tone is analytical and somewhat critical, aiming to temper public expectations and provide a realistic perspective on AI advancements.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing a realistic assessment of AI capabilities, which can help manage public expectations and prevent disillusionment. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the limitations of current AI technologies and the challenges in achieving AGI. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the hype around AI without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to better inform society about the realistic capabilities of AI, contributing to a more informed public dialogue. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.