Marianne Williamson

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 130
In reply to:

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the character and actions of a public figure, contributing to a broader debate about political leadership and democracy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to intend harm but does criticize the character of a public figure, which can be seen as a necessary part of political discourse. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the public actions and character of a public figure, which is a legitimate area of critique in public discourse. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by acknowledging some agreement with the public figure's actions but ultimately criticizes their character and respect for democracy. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by focusing on specific issues related to the public figure's character and actions. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments against other participants in the conversation. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to express a viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]