Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 69
8/5/2024, 10:44:14 PM
X
In reply to:
gracie Be
@BuckmanGracie
·
345d
@marwilliamson @Kenworthdiesel Maybe, but then we’re voting for the same corruption that we’ve been calling out for the last year and a half.
So, I just can’t.
A third party will never win if we don’t believe in it first! We will see it when we believe it! (And when we VOTE IT!!) 🗳️
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
345d
@Kenworthdiesel You're right. That's why I pointed out things she stood for in the past. The best argument for the Harris campaign at this point is its greater chance of defeating Trump. If she doesn't reclaim her past progressive positions, though, then even if she wins it's just kicking the…
Bobson Dugnutt
@Kenworthdiesel
·
345d
@marwilliamson What do you agree with in regards to Kamala's policies? As far as I've been able to tell, she has no platform whatsoever
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
346d
It's such a sophomoric idea to accept any candidate on the basis of their agreeing with you about every little thing.

I listen to Bobby Kennedy and sometimes I agree; sometimes I disagree. I listen to Cornel West and sometimes I agree; sometimes I disagree. I listen to Kamala…

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the impact of Supreme Court appointments and their implications for democracy and women's rights, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is critical but not overtly hostile, and the intent appears to be to provoke thoughtful consideration of the complexities involved in political decisions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but does criticize the actions of the Supreme Court and their consequences. This is a nuanced critique rather than a harmful attack. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the actions and decisions of public figures rather than engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting the complexities and consequences of political decisions, encouraging deeper thought rather than simplistic conclusions. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Supreme Court appointments and their impact, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the issues at hand. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to responsibly discuss significant public issues with integrity. [+1]