In reply to:
Uncle Vaxx
@theemfguy
·
346d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
346d
r/AdvancedSpirituality
@CreationIsLove
·
346d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
346d
The statement by @theemfguy addresses the complexity and difficulty of making a decision in the current election, responding to a critique about ambivalence and rationalization. The tone is defensive yet understanding, aiming to justify a position of indecision.
- The statement does not cause harm and instead seeks to explain a position of ambivalence, which can be seen as a neutral or even positive contribution to the discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the difficulty of the situation and validating the feelings of those who are ambivalent. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the critique without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly expressing a personal viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.