Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 89
8/6/2024, 1:12:47 AM
X
In reply to:
Steven Marlow
@sd_marlow
·
420d
@GaryMarcus @steph_palazzolo @theinformation At this point, OpenAI is just "leading brand recognition" and likely won't even be around as a company by the end of next year.
Betting that it will just be Microsoft AI by then.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
420d
@steph_palazzolo @theinformation with the scoop:
The Information
@theinformation
·
420d
Exclusive: OpenAI President Greg Brockman, co-founder John Schulman, and product leader Peter Deng have left the ChatGPT developer.

https://www.theinformation.com/a…

From @steph_palazzolo and @jon_victor_
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
420d
OpenAI looking like Game of Thrones.

Ilya, Andrej, Jan Leike, etc departing in last several months and now … this:

The statement and the preceding conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the leadership changes at OpenAI, a significant player in the AI industry. The conversation includes opinions and predictions about the future of OpenAI, which are relevant to public interest and the tech industry.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the comparison to WeWork, which is known for its dramatic rise and fall, could be seen as a harsh critique.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of individuals by not delving into personal attacks or private matters. It focuses on professional roles and industry implications. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement could promote understanding and empathy by encouraging readers to consider the challenges faced by OpenAI. However, the comparison to WeWork might undermine this by framing the situation negatively.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by comparing OpenAI to WeWork, suggesting potential instability. However, it could be seen as a personal attack on the company's reputation. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss significant industry changes, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by informing the public about important developments. [+1]