Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 94
8/6/2024, 1:31:21 AM
X
In reply to:
Steven Marlow
@sd_marlow
·
421d
@GaryMarcus @steph_palazzolo @theinformation With Altman not having large, direct shares keeping him there, banking on his name recognition is an even bigger risk than ever.
Steven Marlow
@sd_marlow
·
421d
@GaryMarcus @steph_palazzolo @theinformation .. and is there anything left for them to base a new round of funding on?! What is it, about 12 months of run time, less than that before someone (not smart) bails them out (with any amount having to cover another year of $5B+ monthly burn rate).
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
421d
@sd_marlow @steph_palazzolo @theinformation See substack essay I just posted - they may well be seen as the WeWork of AI
Steven Marlow
@sd_marlow
·
421d
@GaryMarcus @steph_palazzolo @theinformation At this point, OpenAI is just "leading brand recognition" and likely won't even be around as a company by the end of next year.
Betting that it will just be Microsoft AI by then.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
421d
@steph_palazzolo @theinformation with the scoop:
The Information
@theinformation
·
421d
Exclusive: OpenAI President Greg Brockman, co-founder John Schulman, and product leader Peter Deng have left the ChatGPT developer.

https://www.theinformation.com/a…

From @steph_palazzolo and @jon_victor_
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
421d
OpenAI looking like Game of Thrones.

Ilya, Andrej, Jan Leike, etc departing in last several months and now … this:

The statement 'Now that would be a plot twist, if he were to leave.' is a speculative comment in response to a discussion about the potential departure of a key figure from OpenAI. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the stability and future of OpenAI, referencing recent high-profile departures and financial concerns. The tone is speculative and somewhat critical, reflecting concerns about the company's future.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is speculative and does not contain any harmful language.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on speculation and critique.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a speculative comment about a potential event.