The statement expresses a strong opinion about the Supreme Court's role in limiting the administrative state and includes a call to action by linking to a website. This indicates engagement with public issues and debates, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but the aggressive tone ('SHUT DOWN') could be seen as confrontational. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on a political stance. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a political change, which can be seen as an attempt to better society from the speaker's perspective. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.