In reply to:
Pawel Pachniewski
@pwlot
·
524d
The statement by @GaryMarcus addresses concerns about leadership and confidence in Sam, presumably a public figure, and references broader issues such as safety and government involvement. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates related to organizational leadership and policy implications.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a reasoned response to a public debate. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging different perspectives and referencing additional material for further reading. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, addressing the points made by @pwlot without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing thoughtfully to the discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.