Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 68
8/6/2024, 5:12:32 PM
X
In reply to:
Mᴏᴛʜᴇʀs Wɪʟʟ Rᴇᴄʟᴀɪᴍ Aᴍᴇʀɪᴄᴀ
@MOMSreclaim
·
351d
When kids are fed quality meals in our schools, they "do better—their behavior is better, their attention's better, their performance is better, they succeed, and there's example after example..."
~Dr. Mark Hyman w/
Marianne Williamson
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
351d
Many have brought up the topic of whether or not the lunches our children receive at school are healthy, and it’s a valid concern. There are efforts to address that question - to reject the undue influence of big Food - throughout the country. And those efforts need our support.

The statement 'Thank you' in response to a conversation about the quality of school meals does not constitute public discourse. It is a brief, appreciative reply that does not substantively engage with the public issue being discussed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement is neutral and does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not involve acknowledging or correcting mistakes.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for societal betterment.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not engage with free speech principles.