Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement engages in a discussion about political figures and their stances on international issues, specifically relating to Netanyahu and the IDF. It critiques Shapiro and contrasts him with Walz, implying a broader commentary on political values and respect for the audience.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative judgment on Shapiro, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the dignity of Shapiro by criticizing his actions and statements. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and divisive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but borders on personal attacks by questioning Shapiro's respect for the audience. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity due to its critical tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.