Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about the capabilities and future of AI, which is a significant public issue. The tone is defensive and challenges the credibility of the previous speaker, indicating a contentious dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is confrontational and could escalate the argument, which might indirectly cause harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does challenge the credibility of another person, which could be seen as disrespectful.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it challenges the other person to prove their point, which can be seen as confrontational and not conducive to a productive discussion. [-2]