Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is critical of a legal approach that appears to protect businesses at the expense of consumers. The tone is sarcastic and somewhat confrontational, aiming to highlight perceived flaws in the legal system or policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses sarcasm and a confrontational tone, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, though it does not directly attack individuals. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and it does not violate privacy or dignity.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it uses sarcasm to criticize. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a sarcastic tone that could be seen as dismissive rather than engaging in a meaningful discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and addresses a public issue, but the sarcastic tone may undermine the responsible and constructive use of the platform.