In reply to:
Jade Cole
@JadeCole2112
·
527d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the ownership and motivations of a public figure (Sam Altman) in relation to OpenAI and its associated companies. The conversation touches on issues of privacy, data collection, and potential conflicts of interest, which are relevant public concerns.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It provides factual information about equity ownership without making harmful accusations. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on publicly available information and not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a factual discussion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing additional information relevant to the discussion. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing factual information and contributing to the public discourse with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.