Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 63
8/7/2024, 6:41:56 PM
X
In reply to:
ScruffyNerd
@JWNijhuis
·
357d
@marwilliamson Therefore - He was not chosen because he was a Jew. That is anti-Semitic and you are on here praising Walz instead of speaking truth to power over an issue anyone with eyes can see. Do better...Be Better...I really used to respect you and your views
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
357d
@JWNijhuis Excuse me..?
ScruffyNerd
@JWNijhuis
·
357d
@marwilliamson too bad you support anti-Semitism Marianne, that's the only explanation why a guy polling 60% in Pennsylvania (a must win State) wasn't picked as VP. His Jewish stance on Palestine was too big of a problem for them.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
357d
Tim Walz argued as a teacher for a curriculum of kids learning about the Holocaust in the context of historical human rights abuses. He was right. Every American child should learn about the history of slavery and Jim Crow in the United States as well.

Learning about such…

The statement by @marwilliamson constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the selection of a political candidate and the implications of anti-Semitism in that context. The tone is defensive and explanatory, aiming to clarify a previous statement and address an accusation of anti-Semitism.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying a potentially harmful accusation and providing a rationale for the decision in question. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It addresses the issue without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by explaining the complexity of the decision and suggesting that it was based on past statements rather than religious identity. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the disagreement directly and providing a reasoned response without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a serious accusation and providing a thoughtful response. [+1]