Marianne Williamson

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 54
8/7/2024, 8:02:23 PM
X
In reply to:
Koblentzer Rebbe
@RabbiKolakowski
·
362d
@bullfrog2651 @marwilliamson Same thing that the reason Democrats invented gun control was to keep African Americans powerless like they did the Native Americans.
Bullfrog2651
@bullfrog2651
·
362d
@marwilliamson How about learning how the disarmament of the native americans led to the biggest massacre by the US government to highlight how murderous our government actually is and show why americans should never give up their guns?

#woundedknee
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
362d
Tim Walz argued as a teacher for a curriculum of kids learning about the Holocaust in the context of historical human rights abuses. He was right. Every American child should learn about the history of slavery and Jim Crow in the United States as well.

Learning about such…

The statement 'Um, no' is a brief and dismissive reply to a complex and controversial discussion about gun control, historical disarmament, and racial issues. It does not substantively engage with the public issues being discussed, nor does it provide any meaningful contribution to the civic dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm directly, but its dismissive nature could be seen as unconstructive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is dismissive and does not contribute to a deeper understanding of the issues. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is dismissive and does not address the arguments presented. [-1]