Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the dissemination of potentially misleading information by a public figure. It critiques the retweeting of a digitally altered image that misrepresents a poll question, which is a significant concern in the context of public discourse and media integrity.
- The statement aims to do no harm by clarifying misinformation, which is crucial for informed public discourse. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the content of the tweet and the issue of misinformation rather than engaging in personal attacks. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By promoting the correction of misinformation, the statement uses words to promote understanding and integrity in public discourse. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue of misinformation without resorting to personal attacks. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implicitly acknowledges the importance of correcting mistakes by highlighting the altered image and the authentic poll question. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- By addressing the issue of misinformation, the statement uses its influence to promote a more informed and truthful public discourse. It adheres to this principle. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.