Matt Taibbi

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 8
8/8/2024, 12:49:34 AM
X
In reply to:
Mike
@mike__cunning
·
470d
@wrs_willoughby @walterkirn @mtaibbi Source is that piece he quoted.
Spil
@wrs_willoughby
·
470d
@walterkirn @mtaibbi Sources?
Walter Kirn
@walterkirn
·
470d
@wrs_willoughby @mtaibbi Except the story is true
Spil
@wrs_willoughby
·
470d
@mtaibbi Look how far Matt Taibbe has fallen
There was a time when he was considered a journalist
Founded in 2019 by Qanon promoter Tracy Diaz,
UndercoverDC is an extreme right-wing website "Conspiracies, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, False Claims"

http://mediabiasfactcheck.com/un…
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
470d
American Stasi: Tulsi Gabbard Confirms "Quiet Skies" Nightmare
Placed on a terror list, the former Hawaii congresswoman and her husband were tailed by Air Marshals and bomb dogs. "Unconstitutional on every level," she says. "And I'm not the only one."

https://www.racket.news/p/americ…

The statement and the preceding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the credibility of sources and the veracity of a news story involving a public figure and alleged government actions. The tone of the statement is defensive and aims to provide evidence to support the claim made in the original post. The intent is to validate the sources used in the story and counter the criticism of relying on questionable sources.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on providing evidence rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the sources used and attempting to provide a more comprehensive view of the evidence. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the criticism directly and providing counter-evidence, rather than resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to contribute to the public discourse on the credibility of sources and the veracity of news stories, which is important for the betterment of society. [+1]